In the landscape of engineering in Pakistan, the role of the Pakistan Engineering Council (PEC) has become a focal point of discussion. Originally established to foster professional excellence, recent scrutiny has brought to light concerns regarding its efficacy and resource allocation, particularly in addressing the needs of young engineers.

The backbone of technological progress in any nation rests on its engineering community. In Pakistan, however, many young engineers find themselves grappling with a range of challenges – from limited opportunities for professional growth to a lack of support from regulatory bodies. Rather than thriving, the engineering community often faces struggles due to inadequate resources and a lack of representation In Pakistan Engineering Council.

While the PEC, as the regulatory body for the engineering profession, is tasked with ensuring the welfare and professional development of engineers, questions have been raised about the allocation of funds. There is growing unease regarding the transparency of expenditures, particularly in terms of travel allowances (TA) and daily allowances (DA). Concerns linger about whether these expenses genuinely serve the interests of the engineering community or if they are misappropriated.

One of the pressing issues facing PEC is its apparent shift towards a political nature rather than maintaining a focus on professional excellence. The leadership has been criticized for lacking a practical understanding of engineering challenges, leading to a growing disconnection between the regulatory body and the community it serves. Moreover, corruption concerns add another layer to the challenges faced by PEC. Allegations of misuse and misappropriation of funds must be addressed promptly. There is a pressing need for an independent audit of PEC to ensure accountability and transparency in its financial operations.

PEC chairman should be a multi-faceted personality, which would be vital in addressing the concerns related to the current disconnect between the leadership and the engineering community. By selecting an individual who combines technical expertise with leadership, philanthropy, and entrepreneurship, PEC can better serve its purpose of promoting professional excellence and supporting the needs of young engineers. Advocating for fair and transparent elections within PEC can empower the engineering community to choose leaders who genuinely represent their interests. By participating in the electoral process, engineers can contribute to reshaping PEC into an organization that is responsive to their needs.

In conclusion, the challenges faced by Pakistan’s engineering community are real and demand immediate attention. It is crucial to address concerns surrounding the allocation of resources within PEC and to ensure that the organization’s leadership is composed of individuals with a genuine commitment to the engineering profession. The addition of independent audits can further strengthen accountability and transparency, fostering an environment where PEC becomes a true ally in the professional development of engineers in Pakistan.

Facebook comments