In the realm of human rights, few threads are as vital and intrinsic as the freedom of expression. This fundamental cornerstone empowers individuals to articulate their thoughts, beliefs, and creativity without fear or constraint. Like the air we breathe, this inalienable right serves as the bedrock upon which democratic societies flourish. From the emergence of spoken language to the expansive reach of the digital age, preserving this essential right acts as a beacon of enlightenment, progress, and utmost respect for human dignity.
Censorship, defined as “the suppression of free expression for state security and the removal of objectionable content,” has become a matter of concern in India. The practice of censorship in India has historical roots, driven by the aim to safeguard Indian values from external influences and foster national unity since the country’s independence. Freedom of Speech and Expression, a fundamental right enshrined in the Constitution of India, does come with certain limitations. While Indian citizens have the right to express themselves, the Constitution allows for reasonable restrictions on this right through legislation. Various laws, such as those addressing sedition, hate speech, and defamation, derive their authority from Article 19(2) of the Constitution. This provision also permits the examination of movies, books, paintings, and other forms of expression.
For example, the Supreme Court of India recognizes that if a film is likely to incite violence and disrupt “public order,” it can be subjected to censorship under Article 19(2) of the Indian Constitution. However, the arbitrary nature of such censorship on the grounds of “public order” has become problematic. The broadness of this term allows the state to exercise near-absolute and unaccountable freedom in censoring media, often resulting in violations of freedom of expression and other human rights. Disturbingly, it sends a message that public discourse, including discussions on human rights, can be violently suppressed without consequence.
India’s history of censorship spans generations, tracing its roots back to the colonial era. Enforced by the British to stifle political opposition and consolidate their rule, these censorship laws were seamlessly passed on to the newly independent Indian Government in 1947. Although evolving to encompass contemporary media platforms like films and social media, the underlying objective of these regulations remains unchanged: to govern the dissemination of information and safeguard the government against scrutiny and censure. India, no stranger to measures curbing free speech, boasts a repertoire of laws and regulations that can potentially stifle voices of dissent. Among these, the Indian Penal Code dating back to 1860 and the Information Technology Act of 2000 stand as prominent examples. These laws have been exploited to silence government critics, muzzle journalists, and suppress the activism of human rights defenders.
According to a recent independent survey conducted by the Freemuse Organization, India has secured the fourth position out of 89 countries in terms of media censorship. Disturbingly, the survey highlighted that 11 artists were detained in India during the period of 2019-2020. Despite the presence of a vast and diverse mass media landscape in the country, freedom of expression has faced significant limitations and restrictions on numerous occasions. These constraints stem from various factors, including the intolerance displayed by religious hardliners and fundamentalist groups, political pressures exerted by politicians and political parties, and the powerful influence of corporate leaders who dictate advertising expenditures that finance the media.
Indian authorities have also been scrutinized for their intensified focus on journalists and online critics who dare to dissent against government policies and practices. These brave individuals often find themselves subjected to legal action, frequently charged under counterterrorism and sedition laws. This alarming trend not only stifles freedom of expression but also emboldens Hindu nationalists, who feel empowered to target, intimidate, and harass journalists critical of the Indian government. These threats and abuses manifest both in the virtual and physical worlds, with the perpetrators enjoying impunity for their actions. The escalating crackdown on dissent and the resulting climate of fear raise grave concerns about the state of press freedom and democracy in the country.
The Indian government maintains a tight grip on the dissemination of information, exerting considerable control through the implementation of censorship laws and regulations. One area where censorship thrives prominently is within the realm of social media. Authorities wield the power to block or delete content they deem offensive or pose a threat to national security. Consequently, there is a recurring pattern of censorship targeting content that criticizes the government or opposes its policies. The ramifications of such censorship on freedom of speech and expression in India are undeniably profound. These laws and regulations are frequently utilized as tools to silence government critics, journalists, and human rights activists. As a result, they cast a chilling effect on the exercise of free speech, leading to self-censorship. Furthermore, this practice severely limits the public’s access to a diverse range of opinions and information, which are essential for fostering a thriving democracy.
Censorship has emerged as a powerful tool to shape online narratives and control information on various digital platforms. The impact of this trend was acutely felt in December 2020 when the Indian government imposed a ban on the thought-provoking BBC documentary, “India’s Republic at 71,” which openly scrutinized the actions of Prime Minister Modi’s administration. Authorities justified their decision by accusing the documentary of disseminating false information and inciting anti-India sentiments. However, the global community and human rights organizations swiftly condemned this move, citing a violation of the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression.
India’s censorship regime has drawn sharp criticism for its potential infringement on fundamental human rights, particularly the cherished right to freedom of speech and expression. Critics argue that the current laws and regulations lack clarity and consistency, leading to numerous ambiguities. Moreover, these regulations do not always align with internationally recognized human rights standards. Consequently, the calls for necessary reforms have grown louder to safeguard and uphold the vital principles of free speech and expression in India. The pervasive reach of censorship and restrictive legislation poses a grave threat to open dialogue, democratic values, and the free flow of information. As the world continues to grapple with the implications of this concerning trend, it remains of utmost importance to protect and uphold the fundamental principles of free expression in the digital age.
- Biharis: Children of a Lesser God - 11/10/2023
- Anti-Sikh Pogroms of 1984 - 08/10/2023
- Modi’s Saffron Tide is Actually Red - 05/10/2023
